{"id":889,"date":"2020-05-07T18:00:26","date_gmt":"2020-05-07T18:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/?p=889"},"modified":"2020-05-07T18:00:26","modified_gmt":"2020-05-07T18:00:26","slug":"americas-design-causes-it-to-fail-the-covid-19-challenge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/?p=889","title":{"rendered":"America\u2019s Design Causes It to Fail the COVID-19 Challenge"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Eric Zuesse<\/a><\/p>\n

\"ellis_island.jpg\"<\/p>\n

America isn\u2019t the only country which is so corrupt<\/a> as to stand at or near the top of the global coronavirus-infection rankings<\/a>, but, as the June 2020 issue of The Atlantic headlines, \u201cWe Are Living in a Failed State: The coronavirus didn\u2019t break America. It revealed what was already broken<\/a>.\u201d Why did this happen?<\/p>\n

Virtually all other industrialized countries have social-welfare systems in place, such as health-insurance covering 100% of the population; and, consequently, the residents there don\u2019t lose their health insurance if they lose their job \u2014 they therefore aren\u2019t desperate to show up for work even when they are sick or can spread an epidemic. Americans generally are desperate to go to work even if they might be spreading the coronavirus-19. They need the pay and the insurance coverage in order to be able to buy medical care. If they don\u2019t pay for it they won\u2019t get it. So: whomever does show up for work might reasonably be especially inclined to fear likely to catch the disease from a co-worker there. This is one of the many reasons why socializing the healthcare function is vastly more efficient than leaving it to market forces<\/a>.<\/p>\n

On April 23rd, Reuters reported<\/a> that, \u201cU.S. workers who refuse to return to their jobs because they are worried about catching the coronavirus should not count on getting unemployment benefits, state officials and labor law experts say.\u201d In such states, the unemployment-benefits system is being used as a cudgel so as to force employees back to work, and therefore to increase the percentage of the population who will become infected by the coronavirus-19.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, prisons are among the institutions that especially increase the spread of an epidemic such as Covid-19. And the United States has a higher percentage of its residents in prison than does any other country in the world<\/a>. In fact, almost all of the Americans who are in prison are poor (since 100% of the poor cannot afford a lawyer), and the poorer a person is, the likelier that the individual is to get coronavirus-19. This is yet another reason why prisons are a prime place for the spread of the disease. And on April 26th, the New York Times headlined \u201cAs Coronavirus Strikes Prisons, Hundreds of Thousands Are Released:<\/a> The virus has spread rapidly in overcrowded prisons across the world, leading governments to release inmates en masse.\u201d Since America has more of its population in prison than any other country does (lots more: whereas \u201cThe world prison population rate, based on United Nations estimates of national population levels, is 145 per 100,000\u201d<\/a>, America has 655 per 100,000, or 4.5 prisoners for every 1.0 prisoner in the entire world), America has vastly more production of coronavirus-19 that\u2019s generated by its being a police-state than any other country does \u2014 and this isn\u2019t even taking into consideration the rotten, overburdened, health-care system, and the billionaire-propagandized public contempt for the poor, that characterize America\u2019s culture, and that make those prisons, perhaps, the worst amongst industrialized nations. Furthermore, in America, \u201cApproximately 95 percent of criminal cases are plea-bargained, in part because public defenders are too overwhelmed to take them to trial. \u2018That means the state never even has to prove you did anything. They hold all the cards.\u2019\u201d<\/a> So, the Constitutional protections, such as trial-by-jury and all of the other on-paper protections, don\u2019t even apply, in reality, to at least 95% of criminal defendants. And, in many U.S. states, convicts \u2014 and even ex-convicts \u2014 aren\u2019t allowed to vote. America\u2019s billionaires also use many other ways to keep down the percentage of the poor who vote. Taken all together (and to list the other details would fill a book), America\u2019s systematized intense discrimination against the poor constitutes virtually an invitation to this country\u2019s having exceptional vulnerability to any epidemic. The fact that America now has 33.3% of the world\u2019s coronavirus-19 cases<\/a>, though only 4.2% of the world\u2019s population, is actually systemic, and not merely particular to this moment in this country, and in the entire world. Donald Trump, and the current U.S. Congress, are part of a system of oppression, not really exceptions to it (such as the billionaires\u2019 media pretend \u2014 with Democratic billionaires blaming \u201cthe Republicans,\u201d and Republican billionaires blaming \u201cthe Democrats\u201d). The way this Government performs is actually somewhat normal for this country since at least 1980<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In addition, prior to the coronavirus challenge, both America and UK have been reducing, instead of increasing, their social protections; and, therefore, they were the only industrialized nations where life-expectancies were declining even before the coronavirus-19 hit. The recognition and concern about this decline started in UK, but has now started to be published even in the U.S.<\/p>\n

British healthcare scholar Danny Dorling headlined at his \u201cPolitical Insight\u201d blog on 16 July 2016, \u201cAusterity, Rapidly Worsening Public Health across the UK\u201d<\/a> and reported that \u201cthe UK\u2019s Office for National Statistics (ONS) released its latest annual mortality figures \u2013 on schedule. An unprecedented rise in mortality was reported which was revealed to have risen across all the countries of the UK.\u201d Then, on 8 July 2018, London\u2019s Daily Express bannered \u201cBritain is the ONLY European country with a declining life expectancy \u2013 inquiry launched\u201d<\/a>. Then, on 8 March 2019, the blog of the British Medical Journal headlined \u201cThe deepening health crisis in the UK requires society wide, political intervention\u201d<\/a> and reported that UK\u2019s life-expectancy had been plunging since 2014. The BMJ then issued an article on 27 March 2020, \u201cThings Fall Apart: the British Health Crisis 2010\u20132020\u201d<\/a>. In other words: coronavirus hit UK at a time when the Government was already moving away from socializing and into privatizing health care; and, as a consequence, the death-rates had already started increasing in 2015. Coronavirus kills mainly people who already have bad health; and, so, their population were maximally vulnerable to it at the time when this epidemic struck.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the same shortening of life-spans was also occurring in the U.S. On 29 November 2018, London\u2019s Daily Mail bannered \u201cAmerican life expectancy DROPS as suicides and drug overdoses soar and progress against heart disease grinds to a halt, CDC data reveal\u201d<\/a>. A year later, the JAMA Network headlined on 26 November 2019, \u201cLife Expectancy and Mortality Rates in the United States, 1959-2017\u201d<\/a> and reported that \u201cBetween 1959 and 2016, US life expectancy increased from 69.9 years to 78.9 years but declined for 3 consecutive years after 2014.\u201d So: both UK and U.S. life-spans peaked in 2014. Unlike virtually all other nations, these two were declining in health.<\/p>\n

Even prior to 2015, the U.S. was wasting around half of its entire public-and-private spending for health care<\/a> \u2014 it was the most inefficient healthcare system on the planet \u2014 and therefore had significantly lower life-expectancies than all other industrialized countries did. But, now, those remarkably low life-spans are actually getting even lower.<\/p>\n

Political-science studies that are based upon decades of reliably reported data<\/a> have established that ever since around 1980, the United States has been a dictatorship: what the public wants (and even needs) is basically ignored, but what the super-rich (the country\u2019s actual dictators) simply want becomes reflected in governmental policies. That\u2019s the very definition of a \u201cdictatorship.\u201d The U.S. national Government is responsive to the wants of its billionaires, not to the needs of the public (such as protecting their health, education, and welfare, even when the billionaires don\u2019t want it to).The findings in one of these studies are summarized well in a six-minute video, here<\/a>. Although the billionaires who fund America\u2019s liberal Party, the Democratic Party, oppose the billionaires who fund America\u2019s liberal Party, the Democratic Party, oppose the billionaires who fund the Republican Party<\/a> (the conservative Party \u2014 the one that\u2019s overtly in favor of the existing wealth-inequality), this is purely for PR purposes. Whenever the issue becomes their own wealth versus improving the wealth and economic opportunity for the poor, they all go for expanding their own empire (sometimes by funding a tax-exempt \u2018charity\u2019 that will increase, even more, their personal control over the total empire \u2014 by using that tax-exemption to leverage the operation, which will be controlled by themselves instead of by the public tax-funded government). Such \u2018charities\u2019 are mainly tax-dodges. However, in all countries, the people who are the most vulnerable to epidemics are the poor. This also means that the infection-rates and spreading of the disease are the highest amongst the poorest. And, in this epidemic, the interests of the super-rich are opposite to the interests of everybody else<\/a>. And, since the U.S. Government has, for decades now, been serving predominantly the super-rich, instead of the public<\/a>, the people who are the most at risk are also the most ignored. This is even proud policy (\u2018fiscal responsibility\u2019, etc.) in the Republican Party. Bailing-out investors is \u2018necessary\u2019, but bailing out employees and consumers is \u2018fiscally irresponsible\u2019. For example, on April 27th, the Democrat David Sirota headlined \u201cRed States Owe Workers More Than $500 Billion \u2014 The GOP Is Trying to Steal The Money:<\/a> Trump is boosting a McConnell plan to help states renege on promised retirement and health benefits to millions of workers and retirees.\u201d And he is correct. However, his Party is going to be compromising with that (instead of adamantly refuse to accept it and then go on the political hustings shaming the Republican President and Congress-members so as to break them on their blatantly scandalous whoring to the entire billionaire-class, who want their investments to be bailed out before the public is \u2014 which might turn out to be never). It\u2019s a \u201cgood cop, bad cop,\u201d routine, to protect the super-rich. It accepts holding the public hostage to what the big political donors want, instead of focuses against that as being the central political issue of the moment, and of at least post-1980 America.<\/p>\n

This is \u2018democracy\u2019-as-political-scam. For example: some of the Democratic billionaires, who fund anti-Trump ads, pretend to be Republicans<\/a>, in order to be able to peel off some of Trump\u2019s Republican voters, and so are blaming Trump alone for America\u2019s catastrophically bad performance in the coronavirus-crisis<\/a>. They\u2019re just trying to deceive their suckers into voting for Joe Biden, or else not voting at all; and, so, their ad<\/a> doesn\u2019t even so much as just mention Biden. It\u2019s a Biden ad that makes no mention of Biden. It hides its true motive. That\u2019s typical.<\/p>\n

This is the reason why America is designed so as to fail the coronavirus-19 challenge. The power of big-money (concentrated wealth) is destroying this country. It controls both Parties and their respective media, so the public don\u2019t know (and certainly cannot understand) the types of realities that are being reported (and linked-to) here. It\u2019s also the reason why Joe Biden\u2019s \u201cplan\u201d for dealing with the coronavirus epidemic<\/a> is just as bad a joke<\/a> on the voters as Trump\u2019s is. This is a failing country, which is failing in a bipartisan (both Republican and Democratic Party) way. A \u201cgood cop, bad cop\u201d government is, in reality, all bad cop. (I therefore proposed an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution<\/a> in order to rectify some of the reasons behind this structural failure of the U.S. Government. Perhaps the only alternative to that would be violent revolution, but it would probably make things even worse, not better.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Eric Zuesse America isn\u2019t the only country which is so corrupt as to stand at or near the top of the global coronavirus-infection rankings, but, as the June 2020 issue of The Atlantic headlines, \u201cWe Are Living in a Failed State: The coronavirus didn\u2019t break America. It revealed what was already broken.\u201d Why did […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=889"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/889\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":892,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/889\/revisions\/892"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pbmv.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}